Infrastructure Funding Analyst

PROJECT GUARDIAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING & CAPITAL STRUCTURING ANALYST INTERN

ABOUT MORSBY, GORMAN, MCCARTHY LLC

Morsby, Gorman, McCarthy LLC is developing Project Guardian as a multidisciplinary, project-based initiative focused on infrastructure planning, implementation readiness, policy research, partnership development, evidence management, risk analysis, communications, and program coordination.

Project Guardian’s initial work centers on a proposed Kenya-focused infrastructure pilot. Participants will contribute to research, planning, analysis, documentation, and professional-quality project materials intended to help clarify the pilot’s feasibility, evidentiary foundation, funding requirements, implementation conditions, and potential pathways toward responsible replication or expansion.

Participation does not represent employment by, appointment to, or endorsement from any government, university, funder, investor, lender, development institution, community, or prospective partner. Project Guardian is an independent initiative of Morsby, Gorman, McCarthy LLC unless a separate written agreement states otherwise.

PROGRAM TERMS

• Program dates: October 19, 2026–January 29, 2027
• Holiday pause: December 19, 2026–January 3, 2027, during which no routine work is expected
• Fully remote and asynchronous-first
• Normally 5–10 hours per week
• Work exceeding 10 hours in a week requires advance written approval
• Participants should not ordinarily exceed approximately 15 hours in any week
• Unpaid educational internship
• Academic credit may be available only when approved by the participant’s institution
• No promise or expectation of future employment
• Reasonable academic and accessibility accommodations will be considered
• Participation is subject to applicable confidentiality, data-handling, authorship, attribution, acceptable-use, and release requirements

EDUCATIONAL STRUCTURE

This is a structured, project-based learning experience. Participants receive defined learning objectives, supervised assignments, written or documented feedback, revision opportunities, and exposure to infrastructure finance, development finance, preliminary financial analysis, public policy, partnership structures, and multidisciplinary program work.

Assignments are designed to develop transferable professional competencies through applied work of educational value. Participants may produce portfolio-appropriate materials, excerpts, or descriptions subject to confidentiality, intellectual-property, attribution, securities-law, data-protection, and release requirements.

Inclusion of any project budget, model, funding scenario, capital-stack concept, sources-and-uses table, presentation, screenshot, analysis, or deliverable in a portfolio requires prior written authorization. Authorized portfolio materials may require redaction, replacement with synthetic figures, aggregation, modification, or explanatory limitations.

Academic credit may be available only when approved by the participant’s institution. Participants are responsible for initiating and satisfying their institution’s credit-approval process. Morsby, Gorman, McCarthy LLC will reasonably cooperate with legitimate institutional documentation, learning-agreement, supervision, evaluation, and verification requirements when provided with sufficient notice.

Academic credit is not guaranteed and is not required for participation. The availability, amount, classification, and conditions of credit are determined solely by the participant’s institution.

The internship is intended to complement academic study and professional development. Participants will not displace regular employees, act as securities brokers or placement agents, solicit investments, negotiate financing, or independently perform functions requiring licensed investment, legal, accounting, tax, valuation, banking, procurement, engineering, or other specialized professional judgment.

ROLE PURPOSE

The Infrastructure Funding & Capital Structuring Analyst supports Project Guardian by helping develop preliminary, clearly qualified funding scenarios for the proposed Kenya-centered infrastructure pilot.

The analyst may assist with preliminary cost categorization, sources-and-uses analysis, capital-stack concepts, funding-gap analysis, stage-based funding needs, financing-instrument comparisons, scenario modeling, sensitivity analysis, affordability considerations, and documentation of assumptions and dependencies.

The role is intended to help distinguish among:

• Pilot-development and validation costs
• Implementation and deployment costs
• Operating and maintenance requirements
• Contingency and reserve assumptions
• Replication or expansion requirements
• Grants, sponsorships, technical assistance, in-kind support, public funding, concessional finance, debt, equity, guarantees, blended-finance concepts, and other possible instruments

This role is distinct from the Business Development & Capital Markets Analyst. That position focuses primarily on market mapping, organization profiles, opportunity qualification, and prospective-partner research. This position focuses on preliminary financial structure, sources and uses, funding scenarios, instrument characteristics, assumptions, sensitivities, and financing dependencies.

This is a hands-on contributor internship, not an investment-banking, securities, lending, accounting, valuation, fundraising, or transaction-execution position.

All models and financing concepts will be educational and preliminary unless separately reviewed and approved by appropriately qualified professionals.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

By the conclusion of the internship, the participant should be able to:

• Distinguish development, pilot, implementation, capital, operating, maintenance, contingency, and expansion costs
• Develop a clearly labeled preliminary sources-and-uses framework
• Explain the basic characteristics of grants, in-kind support, concessional finance, debt, equity, guarantees, public funding, and blended-finance concepts
• Match possible funding instruments to project stage, purpose, risk, repayment capacity, and readiness
• Develop preliminary capital-stack scenarios without presenting them as recommendations or commitments
• Document assumptions, exclusions, dependencies, contingencies, ranges, and unresolved costs
• Conduct basic sensitivity and scenario analysis
• Distinguish nominal, real, local-currency, and foreign-currency figures where relevant
• Identify timing, currency, inflation, repayment, affordability, liquidity, and refinancing considerations
• Recognize the difference among project cost, funding need, financing capacity, valuation, affordability, and investor return
• Identify when accounting, tax, legal, investment, banking, procurement, engineering, or regulatory review is required
• Connect funding scenarios to implementation milestones, evidence needs, governance, and local participation
• Communicate preliminary financial concepts clearly to financial and nonfinancial collaborators
• Apply confidentiality, attribution, model-control, and responsible-tool practices
• Incorporate supervisory feedback into revised analysis and documentation

PRIMARYXpath RESPONSIBILITIES

Pilot Cost and Funding-Need Analysis

• Help organize preliminary pilot costs into clear and decision-useful categories
• Distinguish one-time development costs from recurring operating and maintenance requirements
• Separate validation-stage needs from longer-term replication, expansion, and capital requirements
• Identify cost timing, dependencies, responsible workstreams, confidence levels, and source status
• Document whether figures are sourced, quoted, estimated, assumed, derived, provisional, or unknown
• Identify omitted, duplicated, inconsistent, or insufficiently supported cost categories
• Avoid treating early planning estimates as final budgets, bids, engineering estimates, or contractual prices
• Coordinate material technical-cost questions with appropriate engineering or implementation contributors
• Route accounting, tax, procurement, legal, and professional cost-estimation questions for qualified review

Sources-and-Uses Analysis

• Develop supervised preliminary sources-and-uses tables
• Organize proposed funding sources by instrument, provider category, stage, timing, restriction, certainty, and permitted use
• Organize uses by cost category, milestone, phase, timing, and dependency
• Identify mismatches between restricted sources and proposed uses
• Distinguish identified, eligible, targeted, applied-for, committed, received, and available funding
• Avoid presenting a prospective or hypothetical source as committed capital
• Reconcile total preliminary sources, uses, gaps, contingencies, and exclusions
• Document material assumptions and unresolved differences
• Maintain version and review history for significant changes

Funding-Instrument Research

• Research grants, sponsorships, technical assistance, in-kind support, public funding, challenge funds, concessional finance, guarantees, debt, equity, and blended-finance concepts
• Document each instrument’s general purpose, potential advantages, constraints, repayment characteristics, restrictions, eligibility considerations, and project-stage relevance
• Distinguish grants from loans, guarantees from funding, commitments from disbursements, and equity from revenue or donations
• Avoid assuming that an instrument is available or appropriate merely because it exists in other projects
• Identify legal, regulatory, tax, currency, security, collateral, governance, reporting, procurement, and approval questions requiring specialist review
• Use authoritative sources and preserve citations
• Present instrument comparisons as educational decision support rather than individualized financial advice

Preliminary Capital-Stack Scenarios

• Help develop supervised conceptual capital-stack scenarios
• Distinguish grant, sponsor, public, concessional, commercial, guarantee, equity, and in-kind components where relevant
• Define the purpose, order, timing, dependencies, restrictions, and assumptions associated with each component
• Identify which proposed components are hypothetical, conditional, unavailable, or dependent on further readiness work
• Test whether scenarios align with the pilot’s stage, cost profile, evidence, governance, and plausible repayment or support capacity
• Avoid designing or presenting a structure as executable, investable, bankable, tax-efficient, or legally compliant without qualified review
• Avoid calculating or presenting investor returns as offers, promises, or recommendations
• Clearly label conceptual structures and unresolved professional-review needs

Funding-Gap and Readiness Analysis

• Compare preliminary funding needs with identified or hypothetical sources
• Identify funding gaps by phase, category, timing, and restriction
• Distinguish a financing gap from a documentation, eligibility, evidence, governance, capacity, or sequencing gap
• Identify readiness conditions that may affect access to particular instruments
• Document dependencies involving permits, technical validation, local participation, governance, procurement, safeguards, monitoring, or counterparties
• Recommend additional internal research or readiness work
• Avoid presenting a funding gap as proof that debt or equity financing is appropriate
• Coordinate with the Funding and PPP Integration Lead on opportunity readiness and sequencing

Preliminary Financial Modeling

• Support development of supervised, appropriately bounded spreadsheet models
• Organize assumptions, calculations, outputs, checks, scenarios, and notes in a transparent structure
• Separate hard-coded inputs from formulas where feasible
• Label units, currencies, time periods, price bases, and source dates
• Develop basic checks for totals, signs, balances, timing, and scenario consistency
• Document calculation logic and known limitations
• Avoid excessive complexity or false precision
• Avoid representing successful spreadsheet calculations as evidence that the assumptions are reliable
• Preserve source, version, reviewer, and change information
• Use synthetic or clearly labeled preliminary figures where appropriate

Scenario and Sensitivity Analysis

• Develop supervised base, lower, upper, delay, cost-change, or alternative-funding scenarios
• Identify which variables materially influence the model’s results
• Test changes in timing, cost, currency, inflation, utilization, funding mix, or other approved assumptions
• Explain scenario results without presenting them as forecasts
• Distinguish sensitivity analysis from probability or prediction
• Avoid selecting only favorable scenarios
• Identify breakpoints, unresolved dependencies, and information that would reduce uncertainty
• Clearly communicate the limits of available data and model structure

Affordability, Repayment, and Sustainability Considerations

• Support preliminary examination of operating costs, maintenance requirements, replacement needs, affordability, potential revenues, subsidies, or support mechanisms where relevant
• Distinguish project benefits from cash flow available for repayment
• Avoid assuming that economic or social benefits generate financial returns
• Identify timing differences among expenditures, revenues, disbursements, and repayment obligations
• Document unverified demand, pricing, utilization, operating, and collection assumptions
• Identify questions requiring local, technical, financial, social, or regulatory validation
• Avoid recommending tariffs, fees, subsidies, borrowing, or investment terms
• Present analysis as preliminary decision support subject to qualified review

Currency, Inflation, and Timing Considerations

• Identify the currencies, dates, price bases, and conversion assumptions used in preliminary figures
• Distinguish nominal from real values and current from historical figures
• Record exchange-rate sources and dates where conversions are authorized
• Avoid treating a single exchange rate as valid across an extended implementation period
• Identify potential foreign-exchange, inflation, timing, and convertibility considerations without presenting regulated financial conclusions
• Document how delays or phased implementation may affect costs and funding needs
• Route hedging, currency-control, treasury, banking, and tax questions for qualified review

Comparative Financing Research

• Research publicly documented financing approaches used in relevant infrastructure or development projects
• Record project purpose, geography, stage, participants, instruments, announced amounts, dates, and sources
• Distinguish announced, committed, closed, disbursed, restructured, operating, and completed activity where information permits
• Identify material differences in scale, credit, governance, regulation, revenue, risk, and local context
• Avoid treating another project’s structure as directly transferable
• Avoid using incomplete public information to infer confidential transaction terms
• Use comparisons to identify questions and possibilities rather than to make unsupported predictions

Model Documentation and Review

• Prepare model guides, assumption registers, source notes, change logs, review records, and limitation statements
• Identify the owner, purpose, authorized use, version, status, and review date of each material model
• Make calculations understandable to authorized reviewers
• Flag circular references, broken links, hidden assumptions, inconsistent formulas, and unexplained overrides
• Preserve previous approved versions where required
• Coordinate with the Evidence and Quality Assurance Lead on material quantitative claims
• Coordinate with the Knowledge and Data-Room Manager on controlled storage and disclosure status
• Avoid releasing editable or sensitive models externally without authorization

Cross-Functional Collaboration

• Coordinate with the Funding and PPP Integration Lead on funding strategy, opportunity readiness, and partner requirements
• Coordinate with the Business Development & Capital Markets Analyst on institutional and market research
• Coordinate with technical and engineering contributors on preliminary cost categories and implementation dependencies
• Coordinate with the Data & Systems Analyst on definitions, sources, and structured data requirements
• Coordinate with risk contributors on financial, timing, dependency, and continuity risks
• Coordinate with communications contributors on accurate presentation of scenarios and financial information
• Escalate conflicts in assumptions, figures, sources, or terminology
• Maintain usable handoff records when responsibility changes

SUPERVISION, FEEDBACK, AND REVISION

The Infrastructure Funding & Capital Structuring Analyst will receive assignments, guidance, and feedback from designated project or workstream leadership.

The analyst will ordinarily coordinate closely with the Funding and PPP Integration Lead, Program Director, Deputy Program and Operations Manager, Evidence and Quality Assurance Lead, and relevant finance, data, engineering, risk, or business-development contributors.

The educational workflow is expected to include:

• Initial orientation to Project Guardian’s scope, status, financial limitations, authority boundaries, and confidentiality requirements
• Defined assignments connected to the role’s learning objectives
• Access to approved templates, examples, assumptions, sources, and project context
• Scheduled or milestone-based supervisory review
• Formula, model, source, and documentation review where appropriate
• Written, annotated, or otherwise documented feedback
• Opportunities to ask questions and clarify expectations
• Reasonable opportunities to revise substantive work
• Progressively more complex assignments where supported by demonstrated readiness
• Periodic reflection on professional development and learning progress
• A final review or evaluation where appropriate

Feedback may address financial reasoning, model structure, calculation accuracy, source use, assumptions, scenario discipline, transparency, documentation, professional limitations, written communication, collaboration, and the participant’s ability to incorporate revisions.

EXPECTED EDUCATIONAL OUTPUTS

Depending on project needs, participant readiness, source availability, workstream placement, and supervisory direction, outputs may include:

• Preliminary pilot-cost frameworks
• Sources-and-uses tables
• Cost-category and funding-need schedules
• Funding-instrument comparison matrices
• Conceptual capital-stack scenarios
• Funding-gap analyses
• Stage-based funding plans
• Preliminary spreadsheet models
• Assumption, source, exclusion, and contingency registers
• Scenario and sensitivity analyses
• Affordability and operating-sustainability research
• Currency, inflation, and timing notes
• Comparative infrastructure-financing research
• Model checks, review notes, and change logs
• Financial-risk and unresolved-question records
• Model guides and handoff documentation
• Substantive original research, analysis, modeling, and writing

Outputs are educational and developmental materials. Their production does not guarantee financing, investment, adoption, external distribution, transaction execution, implementation, or professional approval.

PERFORMANCE AND LEARNING ASSESSMENT

Progress may be assessed according to:

• Accuracy and organization of preliminary calculations
• Clarity and transparency of assumptions, sources, units, currencies, and time periods
• Ability to distinguish costs, funding needs, sources, financing capacity, and financial returns
• Quality and proportionality of financing scenarios
• Appropriate treatment of restrictions, contingencies, timing, uncertainty, and funding status
• Ability to identify model limitations, broken logic, inconsistent assumptions, and specialist-review needs
• Quality of scenario and sensitivity analysis
• Reliability and usability of model documentation
• Respect for confidentiality, external-communication limits, and securities restrictions
• Ability to communicate preliminary financial concepts to nonfinancial collaborators
• Avoidance of false precision, unsupported valuation, and guarantees
• Ability to receive, evaluate, and incorporate feedback
• Reliability in meeting agreed milestones or communicating constraints early
• Effectiveness in multidisciplinary collaboration
• Growth against the stated learning objectives

Assessment is intended to support learning and program administration. It is not an accounting, investment-banking, securities, valuation, credit, project-finance, or financial-modeling credential.

PREFERRED QUALIFICATIONS

Candidates may be undergraduate or graduate students, postdoctoral researchers, recent graduates, alumni, or early-career professionals. Relevant classroom, volunteer, internship, military, community, entrepreneurial, or professional experience may be considered. No single academic major is required.

Relevant academic areas may include finance, economics, accounting, business administration, infrastructure finance, public policy, public administration, international development, engineering economics, construction management, project management, applied mathematics, or related interdisciplinary fields.

Strong candidates will demonstrate:

• Strong quantitative, analytical, organizational, and written-communication skills
• Interest or experience in infrastructure finance, project finance, development finance, financial modeling, budgeting, economics, or capital planning
• Comfort working with spreadsheets, tables, formulas, assumptions, and scenarios
• Ability to distinguish verified figures from estimates and hypotheses
• Ability to document calculations and explain them to nontechnical collaborators
• Attention to units, currencies, dates, definitions, sources, and model consistency
• Sound judgment regarding confidentiality, financial claims, external communications, and professional limitations
• Willingness to identify errors, document uncertainty, accept feedback, and revise substantive work
• Respect for local context, stakeholder authority, affordability considerations, and cross-cultural collaboration
• Reliability when collaborating across disciplines and time zones

Prior experience relating to Kenya, Africa, infrastructure, international development, public-private partnerships, capital markets, or development-finance institutions may be helpful but is not required.

Applicants are not expected to possess a securities license, professional accounting designation, investment-banking experience, or prior transaction authority.

APPLICATION MATERIALS

Applicants should submit through Handshake:

• A current résumé
• A cover letter explaining their interest in Project Guardian and describing relevant finance, economics, modeling, infrastructure, academic, or transferable experience
• One relevant work sample, such as a financial model, budget, sources-and-uses analysis, economic analysis, finance paper, investment or policy memo, spreadsheet exercise, project-finance presentation, or comparable academic, professional, volunteer, or independent work

Applicants should include a brief explanation of:

• The purpose of the submitted work
• Their individual contribution
• The principal assumptions or methods used
• Any material limitations

Applicants should remove or redact confidential, proprietary, personally identifiable, restricted, privileged, licensed, credential, transaction, or third-party information.

Applicants must not submit confidential transaction materials, material nonpublic information, proprietary financial models, private investor information, client records, or documents they are not authorized to share.

A prior professional work sample is not required. Academic, volunteer, independent, simulated, synthetic-data, or appropriately redacted work is acceptable.

SELECTION PROCESS

Initial screening will be asynchronous. Applications will be assessed based on demonstrated alignment, quantitative reasoning, financial understanding, documentation quality, judgment, learning potential, and the relevance of submitted materials.

Finalists may be invited to complete a brief, time-limited educational evaluation exercise using hypothetical or synthetic information. The exercise may ask the applicant to organize a simple sources-and-uses table, identify assumptions and gaps, compare several funding instruments, or explain the limitations of a preliminary financing scenario.

Any selection exercise will be designed solely to evaluate the applicant’s reasoning and communication. It will not involve actual confidential project information, be used as uncompensated production work, or be incorporated into Project Guardian deliverables without separate written permission and appropriate arrangements.

Live conversations will be limited to finalists or circumstances requiring clarification. References may be requested selectively. Reasonable accommodations are available during the selection process.

Priority application deadline: October 2, 2026. The posting may close earlier or later based on application volume, institutional review timing, or program needs.

SECURITIES, SOLICITATION, AND TRANSACTION LIMITATIONS

This internship does not involve offering, selling, marketing, recommending, arranging, underwriting, or soliciting securities, loans, investments, or financial products.

The analyst may not independently:

• Solicit or accept investments, loans, grants, donations, sponsorships, or financial commitments
• Recommend that any person purchase, sell, or hold an investment
• Identify themselves as a broker, dealer, investment adviser, placement agent, banker, lender, accountant, valuer, or authorized fundraiser
• Distribute offering or solicitation materials
• Provide individualized investment, legal, accounting, tax, credit, valuation, or financial advice
• Discuss or negotiate pricing, returns, interest, collateral, security, covenants, repayment, ownership, or transaction terms
• Promise returns, repayment, eligibility, impact, allocation, tax treatment, or project performance
• Receive transaction-based compensation
• Handle funds, accounts, payment instructions, or banking credentials
• Access or use material nonpublic information
• Perform regulated due diligence, underwriting, customer identification, or credit approval
• Contact prospective investors, lenders, funders, partners, banks, advisers, or intermediaries without prior authorization

All work is limited to supervised internal research, educational analysis, preliminary modeling, and draft materials unless separately authorized and appropriately reviewed.

CONFIDENTIALITY, ATTRIBUTION, MODEL INTEGRITY, AND RESPONSIBLE TOOL USE

Participants may encounter confidential, preliminary, proprietary, sensitive, licensed, financial, or access-controlled information. Such information may be used only for authorized program purposes and handled according to applicable instructions.

Participants must:

• Protect confidential, personal, proprietary, financial, licensed, and restricted information
• Use only authorized systems, accounts, storage locations, models, databases, and transfer methods
• Access only materials reasonably necessary for assigned work
• Avoid uploading confidential, proprietary, restricted, transaction, investor, or financial information to unapproved third-party platforms
• Preserve sources, formulas, assumptions, calculations, checks, review history, and version information
• Distinguish original work from quoted, adapted, collaborative, template-based, generated, or tool-assisted material
• Disclose material use of generative artificial intelligence or automated tools when requested
• Independently verify figures, formulas, currencies, units, dates, transactions, citations, and model outputs
• Avoid fabricating sources, prices, costs, commitments, transactions, returns, approvals, or findings
• Obtain approval before externally sharing project materials or including them in a portfolio
• Report suspected confidentiality, access, formula-integrity, version, or information-handling problems promptly

Automated tools may support learning, brainstorming, organization, research, formula development, analysis, or drafting only when permitted. They may not replace source review, financial judgment, model verification, confidentiality obligations, or responsibility for submitted work.

Restricted or material nonpublic information may not be entered into public or unauthorized artificial-intelligence systems. Generated formulas, calculations, forecasts, and summaries must be independently reviewed.

PROFESSIONAL AND REGULATORY LIMITATIONS

This internship does not authorize the participant to provide or represent that they are providing securities, investment, brokerage, banking, lending, accounting, tax, legal, valuation, procurement, engineering, regulatory, or other licensed professional advice or services.

Models, budgets, sources-and-uses tables, capital-stack concepts, affordability analyses, and financing scenarios are educational and developmental materials. They are not audited financial statements, valuations, fairness opinions, credit decisions, underwriting, offering documents, investment recommendations, engineering cost estimates, legal opinions, or guarantees of financing, repayment, returns, feasibility, compliance, or performance.

Questions requiring specialized professional judgment must be identified and routed for qualified review.

REPORTING AND AUTHORITY

The analyst will receive assignments and feedback from designated project or workstream leadership. The Funding and PPP Integration Lead will ordinarily coordinate relevant funding and capital-structure work. Overall operational coordination remains with the Deputy Program and Operations Manager.

The analyst may:

• Complete approved internal funding, cost, financial-modeling, instrument-research, and scenario assignments
• Develop preliminary models, comparisons, assumptions, checks, and recommendations
• Request clarification and authorized project information
• Identify funding gaps, model limitations, financial risks, dependencies, and specialist-review needs
• Recommend additional authorized research or internal readiness work
• Collaborate with assigned internal participants
• Revise work in response to documented feedback

The analyst may not independently:

• Solicit, offer, arrange, recommend, or negotiate funding or investments
• Contact prospective investors, lenders, funders, banks, advisers, partners, government officials, or intermediaries
• Distribute financial, solicitation, or offering materials
• Commit the company or project to any financial structure, term, payment, or obligation
• Make legal, financial, employment, procurement, partnership, technical, investment, or contractual commitments
• Represent the company, project, university, or any institution externally
• Publish, distribute, or release project materials
• Issue public statements
• Approve final investment, valuation, accounting, tax, credit, legal, financial, or transaction conclusions
• Promise financing, returns, repayment, partnership, implementation, academic credit, employment, publication, or any project outcome
• Authorize another participant to exercise any of these powers

Final decisions concerning financing strategy, transactions, accounting treatment, valuation, external outreach, partnerships, publication, resource commitments, and institutional representation remain with authorized program leadership and, where necessary, qualified professionals.

All external outreach, solicitations, submissions, negotiations, representations, commitments, transactions, and releases require prior authorization.

ELIGIBILITY AND INSTITUTIONAL CONDITIONS

Applicants must be able to participate remotely during the stated program period and communicate reliably in an asynchronous-first environment.

Students seeking academic credit must contact their institution and initiate any required approval, registration, learning-agreement, or internship-verification process. Institutional approval and academic credit are not guaranteed.

Where required, participation may be conditioned on completion of appropriate institutional documentation, confidentiality agreements, information-handling acknowledgments, intellectual-property terms, conflict disclosures, acceptable-use requirements, or other reasonable program documentation.

International students and other applicants are responsible for confirming with their institution or qualified adviser whether participation is consistent with applicable academic, immigration, authorization, funding, or institutional requirements. Morsby, Gorman, McCarthy LLC does not provide immigration, visa, tax, legal, investment, or employment-authorization advice.

EQUAL CONSIDERATION AND ACCOMMODATIONS

Morsby, Gorman, McCarthy LLC intends to consider applicants based on role-related qualifications, demonstrated readiness, learning potential, and program needs. Reasonable accommodations may be requested for the application process or internship experience.

Applicants are encouraged to describe relevant academic, professional, volunteer, military, community, entrepreneurial, caregiving, independent, or lived experience when it demonstrates transferable skills applicable to the role.